Just got in a lil while ago...hot and muggy today, but feels like summer, yay! Just a few thoughts on the passing scene...1st, the whole Pledge of Allegiance thing; perhaps the atheists in question do have some valid concerns over the "under God" phrase, but it's also worth noting that references to a Higher Power permeate our alleged seperation of church and state (more accurately, it is an "Establishment Clause" prohibiting the establishment of a national church, not banishing faith completely from all public spheres); the Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights reference rights endowed by a "Creator", our Presidents place their hands on- gasp!- a Bible when being sworn in, as do witnesses in trials ("So help me, God"), "In God We Trust" is printed on our currency, will all of these be declared unconstitutional by some activist judiciary as well? While some non-believers (and BTW, no particular religion is being cited; the "God" in question could be that of any belief) may be discomforted to some extent, it seems courts in other cases have allowed that "offensive" speech, even that partially funded by government dollars (see: controversial NEA endowments), is protected. But more to the point, aren't there other, more legitimate, more aggregious violations of law and rights and conduct for our courts to be concerned with? 2nd, the latest accounting fiasco...WorldCom...I'm a big believer in private markets, free enterprise, lack of excessive regulation, etc...but these recent accounting scandals have shaken confidence in the market, and w/ some reason. Much like gambling, if "players" (in this case, potential investors) believe the "game" is rigged or fixed, they'll take their money elsewhere, eventually causing the company that cooked its books to lose capital, as well as increasing pressure for government to step in and try to "fix" things. Some are decrying these as the result of our President's alleged coziness w/ "Big Business", but honestly, is anyone naive enuf to believe these practices ALL began only after January 21, 2001? Indeed, it is the Bush Justice Department that is beginning prosecution of these crimes, as well they should. Short answer- prosecute the offenders (sounds like "Law & Order", huh?! ;), and increase the incentives to encourage corporations to report honestly, w/out massive regulation in the process. OK, I'll stop!
"Surrender, surrender, but don't give yourself away..."