Apropos of little...(while sipping on an Ipswich Oatmeal Stout and lamenting a Sunday without football!)
I was watching a documentary recently about the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligent life, possible visits by alien life already, and the like. Over the years I've seen and read countless items about this (as I'm sure many people have- networks such as Discovery, TLC, and A&E have thrived upon them!) My own opinion? Given the vastness of the universe, the odds against there not being any other intelligent life forms anywhere are, well, astronomical (pun only slightly intended!) But what always strikes me about so many of these accounts is the insistence that any aliens must be so much more highly evolved and so much more advanced than us barely-housebroken Earthlings! Why not give our species, our planet, a little more credit? If there are other civilizations spread throughout the universe, it must figure that surely one is more advanced than many/any others- why not ours? Who is to say that ours is not the most advanced race, species, civilization, planet, etc...? Perhaps the reason we have yet to discover any alien signals and the like is that all other intelligent life forms are still living in their equivalent of caves and discovering the joys and wonders of fire and a stick with a sharp point on the end of it! Again, someone must be the most advanced- why not us?!
Speaking of Why Not Us...The recent front-office actions of the Red Sox are more than a bit reminiscent of the pre-Bob Kraft Patriots, the bad old days of Victor Kiam, and the truly strange old days of the Sullivans! Players' coming and goings, rumors of players' goings and comings, Theo gone, co-GM's, Theo returns...hopefully we won't be waiting another (now) 85 years for another WS title...
Roadside memorials...I've never quite understood the mindset behind these. I understand the outpourings of grief associated with the loss of victims to accidents, crimes, etc... and the need to remember those victims. But it seems to me we already have very specific places to do so, places open to mourners and others, places with monuments and spaces to leave items commemorating those who have lost their lives tragically (or otherwise)...they are called "cemeteries." I've never quite understood how a wooden cross on a barren stretch of highway or a collection of candles on a stretch of city sidewalk makes for a more respectful, longer-lasting remembrance of a life lost than placing same near a headstone, a tree planted in remembrance, or similar monument. (And I've never quite understood why teddie bears have become a universal symbol of remembrance in some circles...but different strokes I guess.)
Accuracy in books...I'm currently reading a book about the 1980 US Olympic hockey team; truly a remarkable sports story. Several of the players on that team hailed from the Greater Boston/Eastern Mass. area where I grew up, and still live, so I'm somewhat familiar with the story, the player bios, etc...So I'm reading, and the author screws up- serially- the hometown of one of these players! Mr. Author: how difficult should it be for you- or your editors- to do just a wee bit of fact-checking and vetting before putting book to press? Particularly when one of these players wrote your foreword? Particularly when you're getting paid for your- ahem- efforts?! Sheesh...
Biases...many of us have 'em, I know I do. But I was recently struck by just how strong mine can be at times...I recently also re-read a couple of books on that most-maligned of decades, the 70's. Each came out earlier in this decade, each purported to examine 70's culture and history and how the 70's, moreso than the 60's, truly shaped where we are as a society today. Fair enuf. One was written from a center/left view, one from a center/right, neither especially radical. I could barely contain my disdain for the views, opinions, and conclusions drawn by the former, while I was firmly in the Amen Corner of the latter. Strange. And sad. Two intelligent, informed writers, each writing on the same topic for the same reasons, and again, neither a fire-breathing radical, yet the responses they generated in me...I like to believe that, while I have my views and opinions, I'm relatively open-minded to thoughtful views and opinions that differ from mine, that I can have my views and beliefs challenged respectfully, intelligently- guess I have more work to do on that score.
I've never been much of a "drug" person- not that I'm opposed to adults ingesting whatever they wish (just so long as I'm not forced via my taxes to pay for anyone's care as a result of that ingesting. And the bipartisan- and it IS bipartisan- "War" on Drugs IS an utter waste of law enforcement resources and time) rather, my substance of choice has always been alcohol. Nevertheless, I always thought I was a pretty savvy gal when it came to drug culture references and the like. But one flew completely over my head until, really, maybe five years ago. Aerosmith's Dream On. For years I always thought it was just Steven Tyler waxing oh-so-deeply about the vicissitudes of growing up, growing older:
Every time that I look in the mirror
All these lines on my face getting clearer
The past is gone...
(with that deep, wistful "sigh" after line- pun!- 2.)
It finally dawned on me a few years ago that those "lines" on his face in the mirror getting "clearer" with that "sigh"...read- snort!- were cocaine! Doh!
Yes, I can be quite a naive girl at times!
"Half my life's in books' written pages/Live and learn from fools and from sages..."